For engineering leads shipping reviewed changes
Turn a reviewed task into code with proof beside it.
Keep the requirement, affected files, code diff, focused checks, review findings, and rollback notes in one record. Review the work without reconstructing it from chat and terminal history.
Sign in and you go straight back to the BuildDocket conversation. Work happens in chat. This page never asks for your card details or email address.
FIRST WORKING RESULT
A specification, code change, tests, and review result
- Specification
- Code change
- Tests
- Review result
THE RELEASE LOCK
A green chat is not a passing test, and a passing test is not a release.
A prepared release record cannot push or publish. There is no published conversion case on this page. An in-repo live certificate measured 2026-09-01 records 3 measurable eval cases, verdict pass.
- externalWrites stays 0 — no commit, push, PR, deployment, or production write.
- prPlanStatus and deployPlanStatus may only be approval-required or approved-locally.
- A prepared release record stays pending-authorization; pushExecuted and releaseExecuted are forced false.
- A cross-project identity mismatch is rejected before any work.
HOW THE PACKET MOVES
From a reviewed task to one handoff, with release still waiting.
- 01
You provide the reviewed task, repository boundary, and the checks that define done.
- 02
BuildDocket maps the task to the affected code and shows the planned change before implementation.
- 03
It makes the scoped change and records the diff, focused tests, build results, and review findings.
- 04
You receive one handoff that separates verified results from unresolved work and keeps release actions pending.
A change plan that maps each requirement to affected modules and files
A code diff confined to the reviewed paths
Exact command evidence showing what passed, failed, or was not run
Review findings with rollback notes and a release record awaiting authorization
WHAT YOU CLIP ON
The job only starts when the boundary is named.
Engineering managers and senior developers who already know what should change and need delegated implementation to come back with a reviewable trail.
A ticket, branch, test output, and review discussion usually live in different places. That makes it hard to see whether the code matches the requirement and which checks actually ran.
- 01
A reviewed issue or specification with acceptance criteria
- 02
Repository access plus the files and paths the job may change
- 03
Reproduction steps and the focused test or build commands that matter
KEEP THE STAMP ON
Pushing, merging, and production stay separate authorized actions.
- Early product discovery when the requirement and acceptance criteria are still undecided
- Repositories that cannot be worked within explicit file, command, and secret boundaries
- Automatically pushing, merging, or deploying a change; those remain separately authorized actions
- Replacing the engineering lead who reviews architecture, risk, and production readiness
STARTER
Open an engineering job workspace.
$19.00 is stated here before you register; card payment runs through Stripe Checkout inside the signed-in workspace.
$19.00 per month
Continue to workspace billingBEFORE YOU FILE A JOB
Questions
What does BuildDocket replace?
It replaces the manual work of reconnecting a reviewed task to the branch, diff, command output, review findings, and rollback notes. It does not replace engineering judgment.
What do I need to provide?
Bring a reviewed issue or specification, the repository and allowed path boundary, reproduction steps, and the focused checks that should prove the change.
What comes back?
You receive a scoped change plan, the code diff, exact pass or fail evidence from the commands that ran, review findings, and a release record that still requires authorization.
Will BuildDocket push or deploy the change?
No. The generated release record remains pending authorization. Pushing, merging, and production deployment stay separate actions controlled by your team.
When should I not use it?
Do not use it when the product decision is still open, the specification has not been reviewed, or the repository cannot be bounded safely by files, commands, and credentials.